*****

  • On 6/2/09 we moved! Visit our new Wall Street Folly site at wallstreetfolly.com


  • Web
    Wall Street Folly

*^*^*^*

  • Apple iTunes OmahaSteaks.com, Inc. wine.com

Categories

^^^^^







  • ;

Copyright / Disclaimer

  • Disclaimer: Wall Street Folly offers gossip, rumors, opinions and highlights news which we believe is important. We're heavy on humor and satire (or try to be), and often focus on the hilarious, the sordid, the salacious, the absurd and the horrific that occurs on Wall Street and beyond. The site relies heavily on reported information from other publications and sites which we hope is correct, but may or may not be -- we can't / won't guarantee it. We cite our sources where applicable. So please do your own research and draw your own conclusions. The site is not a broker, dealer, or investment advisor and any opinions are ours alone and are protected by the First Amendment.
  • © Wall Street Folly

« Is Citigroup gonna fight Wells Fargo for Wachovia? | Main | Wachovia / Citigroup / Wells Fargo: Chris Whalen hangs up on an argumentative Alexis Glick »

Comments

Why would the FDIC support the Wachovia transaction. Citi acted in a moment of crisis, and has since provided liquidity support. Allowing a third party to come in, under these circumstances, would severely limit the willingness of the Citi's of the world to take on responsibilities where it would have the risk but could lose any potential award by a late arriving third party. This would seem especially true where Wells Fargo had the chance to make a bid at the same time Citi make its bid, but chose not to do so until subsequent facts made it more attractive.

Hang in there Citi!!! Remember the famous Pennzoil/Texaco deal? I wonder if Joe Jamail is still around?

The comments to this entry are closed.