The Clear Channel fight headline round up
Today in Clear Channel: The company is finally acknowledging that the deal to take it private might collapse owing to the banks' refusal to honor the terms of their original commitment. The banks, led by Citigroup, with an adverse ruling against them in the lawsuit filed by the sponsors in Texas, are trying to have the lawsuit moved out of that state because they don't want to face that famous 'Texas justice'. If you read the text of the lawsuits that the sponsors have filed, if their allegations are true, we think that a good dose of 'Texas justice' served up by pit bull lawyer Joe Jamail is just what they deserve. We hope that the banks get their nuts really squeezed; the banks can't just decide to move the deal goal posts when they feel like it, as they're trying to do here.
Some are questioning TH Lee / Bain's motives in filing suit, suggesting that they really want to also walk and may be after the banks to pick up the $600 million deal break up fee.
- Clear Channel Says Private-Equity Buyout May Collapse
- Clear Channel's Challenge
- New move over Clear Channel lawsuit
- Clear Channel bid row casts doubt over $130bn of deals
- Clear Channel: Clear signals that the banks are shutting their doors
- Clear Channel's Challenge
- Links to the lawsuits
Continue reading "The Clear Channel fight headline round up" »


Barring a bump in the price, the Clear Channel deal is totally toast:


